Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Á¦ ¥°±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ Ä¡·áÀüÈÄ PARÁö¼ö¿Í µÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼± °èÃøÄ¡ÀÇ º¯È­

The Treatment Change of PAR(Peer Assessment Rating) Index and Cephalometric Measurements in Class I Malocclusion Patients

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 1999³â 29±Ç 2È£ p.277 ~ 284
±èÇöÇý, ±èÁ¾Ã¶, À̱âÇå,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÇöÇý (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
±èÁ¾Ã¶ (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
À̱âÇå (  ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract

Á¦ ¥° ±ÞºÎÁ¤È¯ÀÚÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ PAR Áö¼ö°¡ ±³Á¤Ä¡·á±â°£ ¹× Ãø¸ðµÎºÎ ¹æ»ç¼± °èÃø Ç׸ñ
°ú °ü°è°¡ ÀÖ´ÂÁö¸¦ ±Ô¸íÇÏ°íÀÚ 100¸íÀÇ ±³Á¤ ȯÀÚÀÇ Ä¡·á ÀüÈÄ ¼®°í¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ PAR Áö¼ö¸¦
±¸ÇÏ°í, Ãø¸ðµÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø¿¡¼­ 12°³ÀÇ °èÃøÄ¡¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ÈÄ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦
¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Ä¡·á ±â°£Àº ¹ßÄ¡ ¿©ºÎ ¹× Ä¡·áÀü PRA Áö¼ö¿Í »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
2. ANB, FMA, FMIA, IMPA´Â Ä¡·áÀü PAR Áö¼ö¿Í Ä¡·áÀü Ãø¸ðµÎ¹æ»ç¼± °èÃøÄ¡¿¡¼­ ¼ø
»ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
3. 1 to FP´Â Ä¡·áÈÄ PAR Áö¼ö¿Í Ä¡·áÈÄ Ãø¸ðµÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼± °èÃøÄ¡¿¡¼­ ¼ø»ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´°í
1 to FP´Â ¿ª»ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
4. 1 to SN, ¥±A, 1 to FP´Â £¥ PAR ¿Í Ä¡·áÀüÈÄ Ãø¸ðµÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼± °èÃøÄ¡ÀÇ º¯È­·®°úÀÇ °ü
°è¿¡¼­ ¼ø»ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´°í FMA, FMIA, WITS, UL Àº ¿ª»ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú´Â ¼®°í¸ðÇü»óÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ°ü°è¿¡¼­ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ PAR Áö¼ö°¡ Ãø¸ðµÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼± °èÃøÄ¡
Áß »óÇÏ ÀüÄ¡¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ Ç׸ñ°ú ¿¬°üÀÌ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç Á¦¥°±Þ ±¸Ä¡ °ü°è¸¦ º¸À̴ ȯÀÚÁß ANB °ª
ÀÌ Å©°í hyperdivergent ÇÑ ¾È¸ð¸¦ °®´Â °æ¿ì Ä¡·áÀü PAR Áö¼ö°¡ Å« ¿µÇâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³¿À» ½Ã»ç
ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relation between the treatment duration
and cephalometric measurements and the PAR index in Class ¥° malocclusion patients.
In 100 Class ¥° malocclusion patients, PAR score and cephalometric measurements were
taken from study model and cephalometric radiographs and cephalmetric radiographs and
analyzed statistically.
The results of this study were obtained as follows:
1. Treatment duration was correlated with extraction and pre PAR index.
2.ANB, FMA,FMIA and IMPA exhibited positive correlation between pre PAR index and
pretreatment cephalometric measurements.
3. 1 to FP exhibited positive correlation between post PAR index and posttreatment
cephalometric measurements, and 1 to FP exhibited negative correlation.
4. 1 to SN, ¥±A and 1 to FP exhibited positive correlation between £¥PAR reduction and
the change of cephalometric measurements FMA, FMIA, WITS and UL, exhibited
negative correlation.
The results of this study indicate that PAR index taken from study model relate with
items concerned with upper and lower incisors, and there are the tendency that
pretreatment PAR index are larger in the patients with large ANB value and
hyperdivergent face.

Å°¿öµå

PAR Áö¼ö; ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ; Ä¡·á±â°£; µÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼± °èÃøÄ¡; PAR index; malocclusion; treatment duration; Cephalometric measurements;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed